bbg2401

Do you not feel uneasy about demonstrating such entitlement?

But the person being addressed specifically used the term cybercrime.

It should never have been a mere formality anyway.

Damage to property including military bases, damage to property considered to be Jewish-owned, and a documented list of targets including charities, government buildings and financial institutions.

Let’s not trivialise such activities.

We’re firmly beyond the pale when you use a decommissioned prison van as a battering ram, attack security personnel with a sledgehammer and mark people with spray paint.

There is so much misinformation in your comment that it’s difficult to find a good place to start. Even if one were to bother, you’ve started from such a point of disingenuousness that it would be futile.

They said what they wanted to say, and it was quite clear. The person who commented suggests we don't use client-edge compute unless we have a specific need for it, i.e., don't treat it as a default due to its apparent simplicity up front.

You've taken it in a rather odd direction with the request for a framing more palatable to you.

I can’t think of someone more worthy of the collective attention of HN than Rich Hickey.

Drew is hardly one we should listen to on matters spanning weirdness. He’s a total creep.

Oh well, obviously. That's precisely how opinions work. To share several opinions with DHH on matters technical in nature is to agree with all DHH opinions on matters universal.

HN commentary becomes closer to reddit by the day.

Petty aside: Several JS people I know who were previously quite down on using a dependency injection framework are now seeing the benefits after adopting Effect. The most egregious example being a colleague who considered the adaption of DI tooling to be a language-level defect. It’s now one of his primary selling points for Effect.