baigy

I didn't mean the simulator. I meant actual simulations to run in the simulator.

Yea of course. Wasn't meant to be a realistic example. More like a starting point.

So one can say, what's missing from this mental model is localized intelligence that is able to update said code on runtime.

One protip is this site is fundamentally different from reddit. You'll find a greater concentration of intellectuals here. Fewer "drive by shooters" if you know what I mean. And it's much more tightly policed. Stay on topic and enjoy!

My belief is it'll get better over time with organic shapes as LLMs improve their ability to synthesize higher order differentials. I also believe the future may not be coded 3D everywhere, but a mix of code and dumb 3D. But I'm not a huge fan of inverse code recovery; I found that to be extremely lossy.

Do you want to connect over discord or linkedin or something, to cross-pollinate ideas?

Whoa super cool, you guys got the patent too. I hope there's no cease and desist in my future lol (kidding..... not kidding).

This is super interesting. Especially the high-level language > STEP/BRep lowering. Tt feels very complementary to the mesh path we're exploring and potentially the right backend when exact solids matter. I feel your SDF conclusion is useful too. It's tempting to treat it as a universal intermediate, then discover you've lost the structure you need later.

I'll dig into the repos and would compare notes afterwards.