bahularora
Joined 15 years ago
Joined 15 years ago
A person he knew, or he was in touch with sold the said trojan. The indictment also doesn't say if he did gain financially from the sale or not.
So, he developed a trojan possibly for research, someone he knew sold it and he got arrested.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/french-nuclea...
Is it legal to have a extremely one sided agreement? Also if it is signed under threat(no job/no livelihood) isn't it void, as its signed under duress?
When I refused to sign it she said that it might be hard to offer me a job in the case I don't sign it. Which very much sounded like a threat to me. If they insist I would most probably sign it, as without the salary I wouldn't be able to afford rent next month. According to her all the other employees have signed it and none questioned her on it.
Notably non-competes are mostly illegal in India, still almost all agreements I have come across have the clause mentioned in them. I don't understand the point in having a clause like this, when its non-enforceable.
Many other points of the agreement were as egregious as the non-compete clause. Also the whole agreement was extremely one sided. It also said all the IP/Products/patents I develop, even in my own time, during my tenure would belong by the employer.
The government aimed to offer zero-cost bank accounts to extremely low-income citizens and needed zero cost debit cards to make them functional. Rumor has it they asked Visa and Mastercard to waive fees and both declined. Even Indian banks reportedly pushed back.
So India doubled down on RuPay, its domestic card network. What started as a fallback turned into a fintech revolution. Over 559 million bank accounts were opened under this mission, most powered by RuPay.
Ironically, if Visa or Mastercard had agreed, RuPay might never have taken off.