b-x
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
I'm not promoting such practices. In fact, I was just trying to use the legislators logic: if they are truthful about their "protecting children" slogan, let them start their policing where the predators are most likely to be found instead of targeting the entire population.
Does the SM theorize about the impossibility of the monopoles' existence?
Nonetheless, even when coding, one should also consider thoroughly the UX and how it would be addressing the others.
Saying "unsupported word" is much more sympathetic than "needs to be a word" (where you define what a "word" is, and the general user is unaware of such definition).
You may distribute "shame" however you want, but this only helps enforcing the damaging insults and amplifying them.
When you claim that a word in some other culture is not "a word", just because it's not recognized by your machine, that's demeaning to say the least.
I thought that we've reached the time to embrace all cultures in the world, but this retrogressive engine proves that most modern tech designers are myopic about other civilizations in the globe.
It seems for them the solution is to destroy privacy for the entire population.
> Please, don't post simplistic vox populi stuff.
Please ask this to the European Commision instead.