axod
Joined 19 years ago
Joined 19 years ago
Seems pretty conclusive. Very similar story when they bought skype.
1. Put AI in charge of health policy 2. Give it a naive misguided charter/goal eg eliminate suffering 3. Euthanasia for everyone
This is simply AI optimizing for the goal - the goal is the evil/naive/misguided part, not the AI.
Those who aim to "eliminate suffering" are the issue here to be clear, but unfortunately they are a growing group.
If people start giving enough power to AI, with ill thought out goals, and no human in charge, don't be surprised...
Why would it need "free will" or "consciousness" whatever that means?
A concrete example might be putting an AI in charge of health policy, and telling it to "eliminate suffering" without any human to check and push back. Well, the best way to eliminate suffering is...
The UK population grew from about 58.9 million in 2000 to 69 million in 2025 - an increase of roughly 10 million people. The large majority of that came from immigration.
And you don't think having to house an extra 10 million people is a reason for the housing crisis?
I would suggest you do your own research, and use your own logic and reason rather than blindly accepting government reports into why what they're doing is brilliant.
Nothing to do with millions of new people arriving wanting to live somewhere?