ax8080

sure the ones inside the article: "{} simple illustration, naive style, pale colors" the ones in the related / main page: "{} digital art illustration, tetradic moody subdued colors"

Thank you!

Not that it's my merit :)

Can you suggest some cool typography examples? Also, if you could explain a bit about what's wrong with the typography, I'd appreciate it.

I'll contemplate this issue later. I deem this risk to be lower than not discovering a reliable acquisition channel or not being able to attain high margins.

Instinctively it appears as though I'm creating original content. However, all this legal stuff is often counterintuitive.

That would require parsing all of YouTube. I thought I heard that YouTube already did that, but I can't seem to find it now.

Oh, it's okay! In the end, what matters is how much value it gives the user, not how complicated it is inside! thank you!

Nope, Firefox is not planned :( Maybe after Safari, Edge and mobile. Sorry about that.

Yes, I'll probably remove Elon :) Fun fact: twitter banned my ads account, when I tried to create ads with this video.

Thank you! It is very easy for me to make such a service, but then I would lose a lot of users who would install the extension otherwise.

By the way, what browser do you use?

It's not that straightforward. I would say that the most important part of pre-processing is how to break the transcript into parts.

But there are many more things to improve. It's a pipeline: you can add more models, you can train them, you can change prompts, you can post-process the results. But it takes time. More time each step.

Thank you! Yep. Safari and Edge are on my list. It should be easy enough to port there.

It's an interesting idea, but here it's a more pressing issue of copyright infringement.

No, sorry. If I do that, I have to make the plans even more expensive. And users will randomly get free summaries, which will confuse them. "Why should I pay if sometimes I get them for free for no reason?"