avovsya

Joined 13 years ago

Karma
21
Submissions
15
Member since
Feb 28
engineer, musician and music technology geek

@avovsya

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
Apparently this is something I need to research as some people have problems using pinsend behind the NAT
Comment · 1 year ago
Works for me a lot of the times with Telegram Saved messages(similar features to Signal). But some devices won't be my personal so no access to Signal or Telegram
Comment · 1 year ago
Because of two things: 1. I needed to send text from phones to laptop(no easy qr code scanning) 2. Sometimes I need to share a few hundred lines of text
Comment · 1 year ago
That is exactly the case, there is a server in the background responsible for maintaining sessions and setting up WebRTC connections(ICE handshakes), when all clients are connected - messages are sent p2p
Comment · 1 year ago
Thank you! I'm genuinely surprised by a level of feedback I get in the comments, constructive, thoughtful and actionable! Would love to hear from you if there a use case you found for yourself. I've built this as a small utility for myself, by sharing it I hope that feedback will help me to make sure I do not make unnecessary presumptions :)
Comment · 1 year ago
You're right, thank you for answering!
Comment · 1 year ago
Good point, thank you
Comment · 1 year ago
Throttling :)
Comment · 1 year ago
I do have server relay to setup webrtc connection and maintain session ids until those active.

upd: No relay for messages, messages are sent p2p

Comment · 1 year ago
What do you mean by transcript? If you mean the messages that were shared - the answer is no, server sees no messages at all as message exchange is peer to peer via WebRTC. As soon as session is over(eg. When all clients disconnect) - message history is lost for good. Brute force attacks are theoretically possible for sessions in progress(though hard due to alphanumeric 6 character PIN and server throttling), so I'll introduce "safe session" as suggested by some of the commenter by introducing "waiting rooms" so the newly connected clients have to be approved. I'd definitely leave the current workflow as is as its frictionless and works for some of my usecases(quick link or log sharing, etc)
Comment · 1 year ago
Thank you for feedback! Theoretically it's possible, but it's not just digits, it's alphanumeric so the chance is very low. As another user suggested - I will add approval for new clients so it's not going to happen
Comment · 1 year ago
Thank you! Device approval seems like a legit way to make it more secure. I also used messaging apps and notes and emails, but then my channels are full of temp messages and not all devices I use have those.
Comment · 1 year ago
Thank you for the feedback and wormhole.app suggestion! As for QR code - it's already available after you've set up your session, but UI might not be as obvious so I'll work on it. For PIN code - you might be right, though brute forcing PIN codes with 6 alphanumeric characters and throttling on signaling server might not be as easy as it seems.

Communication inside a sharing session is end-to-end encrypted as it uses WebRTC, and session will "expire" as soon as all clients are disconnected, because no data is stored on a server - it's all between connected clients

Comment · 1 year ago
Thank you for your feedback! I do indeed have file transfer in the roadmap and was planning to launch with it(thus the leftover text, thank you for noticing), but file sharing over 100 Kb is still buggy, so it was disabled until better times. It's is buggy because no data goes through my server, it's all P2P using WebRTC(which e2e encrypted). As for open sourcing it - I will consider it as I do not plan to charge for this tool.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton