aunch
Joined 3 years ago
Joined 3 years ago
ill start commenting on other things - i usually just upvote on things that i find interesting but dont know enough to comment on
and wrt the other comment, it is totally accurate - changing developer behavior for these search products is tough! we welcome any ideas :)
Exciting to see more teams take on the code search problem - modern pure regex definitely is a suboptimal solution.
Just to objectively highlight some of the similarities and differences between Bloop and Codeium Search (Codeium also provides Autocomplete) to a user:
- Both are free for individuals
- Both use a mix of AI and regex
- Bloop has both free local and paid cloud offerings, Codeium only works locally (but therefore doesn't work as well on super large codebases)
- Codeium uses custom proprietary embedding models so no dependency on OpenAI and no code is sent to a third party AI
How are you different?
for transparency: I'm from the Codeium team, and we are big fans of getting this AI gen tech to all developers on all IDEs for free - we've also open sourced an emacs plugin: https://github.com/Exafunction/codeium.el
it's cool to see other attempts as well. natural language search done properly can definitely accelerate developers by a ton
We are working on building our own models for Chat to remove this dependency, so you can use Chat while still guaranteeing privacy.
Oh and none of this affects Autocomplete, so downloading Codeium and disabling code snippet telemetry will still give users tons of value :)