atwrk
Joined 3 years ago
Karma
745
Submissions
210
Member since
Sep 7
Joined 3 years ago
[0] older versions had Xtensa cores, not RISC-V.
Just a suggestion, but alternatively you could also accept that in reality, decomissioning actually is expensive.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernkraftwerk_Greifswald (you have to translate that page yourself, the English version doesn't contain the relevant information)
Well sure, but the alternatives aren't really affected by this, because they don't have to be planned and financed these such long time frames. So this is a problem for nuclear. The core technology seldomly is the deciding factor for these things.
The burden of proof that this isn't just a publicity stunt again is squarely on them.