aspir

Joined 16 years ago

Karma
1,573
Submissions
324
Member since
Sep 2
Longtimer at Fastly
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 12 days ago
100% agree. Most of the time, when I hear "this could have been an email," it's from someone with a track record of not reading (or writing and responding to) emails meaningfully.
Comment · 1 month ago
Comment · 2 months ago
Yeah The Who's hiring format isn't a perfect fit for how we have it structured. In general, engineering can hire remote first if there's a good fit, and we have local entities or EOR processes for every EU country (to the best of my understanding)
Comment · 2 months ago
> In terms of the style of reasoning, of the futurists reviewed, he's probably closest to Kurzweil, in that he uses numbers to give a kind of aura of credibility, but if you know something about the topic he's discussing or look at the numbers, the reasoning falls apart.

In one of his posts a few months ago, he went on a weird tangent about the CEO of ServiceNow talking about sales planning and whether his teams are "on plan" or not. For people who haven't spent time in or around sales, this is an extremely common shorthand for quota tracking.

Ed's rant about how impossibly weird and inhuman the framing was revealed how little he knows, and cares to know, about the mechanics of the businesses he claims to profile. Yes, something like "on plan" is jargon, but a shred of reasonable journalistic curiosity (a Google search) would explain what it means and how it's a normal statement for a career-sales CEO.

Comment · 2 months ago
Comment · 4 months ago
Comment · 5 months ago
Comment · 5 months ago
Comment · 6 months ago
How I've starting using the ForeverNotes model on top of Apple notes as a lightweight note tracking system, only to slowly extend and evolve it via various AI tools until I build a full scribe / second brain system
Comment · 6 months ago
We didn't want to get too wordy with a post like this. But to be honest, if you are knowledgeable enough to spot that kind of gap, you might be a perfect fit for what we are working on ;)
Comment · 6 months ago
Comment · 1 year ago
This is an unfortunate state of all open source. The entire economic model is broken, but PSF is one of the better operationalized groups out there.

Not to completely change the topic, but to add context, the Ruby Central drama that has unfolded over the past few weeks originally began as a brainstorm to raise ~$250k in annual funds.

Comment · 1 year ago
This isn't good for the PSF, but if these "poison pill" terms are a pattern that applies to all NSF and (presumably) other government research funding, the entire state of modern scientific research is at risk.

Regardless of how you, as an individual, might feel about "DEI," imposing onerous political terms on scientific grants harms everyone in the long term.

Comment · 1 year ago
Disclaimer: not only am I a Fastly employee, I'm the Fastly employee quoted in the register article originally linked.

We'd argue our stance and focus are a bit different. Our stance is -- we help eng teams and the open web with whatever their preference for AI might be.

If you want to go all in and monetize AI traffic or sign an agreement with a foundation model for training, we have tools that can help you do that. If you want to go scorched-earth on AI bots that try to scrape your systems, we can help you do that too.

It's all about helping engineers tasked with tough problems get their jobs done, regardless of whether the flavor of the week is AI or something else.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton