arkgil

I'm sorry you find it distasteful - that was never our intention. What we found was that a user searching for a PDF generator, creator or writer are generally looking for the same solution - to create a PDF. So by repositioning our tool we were hoping to provide a better landing page experience for users that were searching for one of those specific keywords.

Of course the downside is as you've pointed out - it can be seen as distasteful and in some cases confusing to our users. We will review this on our side and see if it makes sense to remove some of those tools to reduce confusion.

We've had customers in beta trying it out with multi-page tables and we've heard positive feedback.

Do you mean tables when converting HTML to PDF, or simply rendering the PDFs with tables in them?

Our engine is based on Google's PDFium, which is Apache licensed. We use it for rendering and reading the PDF object tree. Editing, annotations, etc. are all built on top of that.

With an annual plan of 10,000 documents per month, we charge $0.04 per document. If you try it out, I'd love to hear your feedback on the quality of OCR!

Signing is something we'd like to explore, we often hear from folks who'd want to simplify their signing workflows. Thanks for the feedback!

Thank you for the feedback! Looking at all the comments here, we will definitely look into improving documentation.

As for network traffic, we use net_kernel module which allows to track throughput between nodes in the cluster. It doesn't rely on specifics you system.