apugoneappu

Joined 6 years ago

Karma
97
Submissions
21
Member since
May 22
• Undergraduate CS student @ IIT Kharagpur • Computer vision • Language + vision • memes
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
ChatGPT does have an enterprise version.

I've seen the enterprise version with a top-5 consulting company, and it answers from their global knowledgebase, cites references, and doesn't train on their data.

Comment · 4 years ago
Looks cool haha but a little too much effort to try!

One thing that works wonders for demos is a button to fill out all fields with your placeholder.

Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
From my limited knowledge of how SSO works, is this possible?

1. A company Acme wants to have SSO in the tools A, B and C that it uses.

2. Another company Balloon integrates with A, B, C to use the admin API for an admin account to modify or delete users in that account

3. Acme logs in to Balloon and connects its admin account of A, B, and C to these integrations.

4. Now Acme has access to employee's accounts in A, B, C through the Balloon's dashboard to modify or delete users etc.

Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Explanation of results for non-ML folks (results on the default supabase repo shown on the homepage):

Codeball's precision is 0.99. It simply means that 99% PRs that were predicted approvable by Codeball were actually approved. In layman, if Codeball says that a PR is approvable, you can be 99% sure that it is.

But recall is 48%, meaning that only 48% of actually approved PRs were predicted to be approvable. So Codeball incorrectly flagged 52% of the approvable PRs to be un-approvable, just to be safe.

So Codeball is like a strict bartender who only serves you when they are absolutely sure you're old enough. You may still be overage but Codeball's not serving you.

Comment · 4 years ago
Probably I'm misled but how is it a code review without looking at the actual code? (not listed as an input feature on the 'how' page)
Comment · 4 years ago
Oh, that's amazing! Thanks for the reply :)
Comment · 4 years ago
It’s still 2 factor, just that a few permitted people have access to the one time password. It’s identical to manually sharing the OTP, just automated.

> The security model doesn’t instill a lot of confidence in me, being that you expect user-interaction as a means of security.

Could you please elaborate on what this means?

Comment · 4 years ago
Hey!

The primary use case is for multiple people wanting to access an account that is behind 2FA.

Example of such folks are - 1) My dad wanting to access my bank account details without having to trouble me 2) Me wanting to login to my brother’s OTT accounts (hotstar, prime etc.) 3) CAs needing bank access for small business owners

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton