Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
Been running it for a few months now, such a great and reliable product. Congrats on the release!
Comment · 1 year ago
I clicked on this because it said rust in the title. Very disappointed.
Comment · 1 year ago
Honestly, I don't even know. My last month bill was for 1947 compute hours for a total of $260. I just have the 4 databases. Looks like two of them are at .5 instead of .25, maybe that's it? Unless they are auto scaling me up occasionally and I'm not aware?
Comment · 1 year ago
> And 250 dollars/month was considered expensive

No, it was not my intention for price to be the main thing people hooked in on with this article. It's the combination of it all. Better reliability, performance, and infrastructure AND it's more affordable.

> warrant a full time dedicated engineer

TBH, it's basically my sole full time job as the CTO.

> half a technical write-up, half an ad for both companies

I've been frustrated by Neon for months now and excited about PlanetScale's new postgres offering. Was pleasantly surprised by it too and wanted to write about it. I do appreciate you writing this and sorry if it comes up too much like an ad for us. Only meant to share our unique experiences and satisfaction with a new thing.

Comment · 1 year ago
Thank you! Yes, totally agree. I do hope to get there one day and would LOVE nothing more than to have a DBA take this to the next steps when we're bigger.
Comment · 1 year ago
I see. Yeah I'm not against usage-based in general. Just specific to database's, especially in my instance where it feels like I'm paying more for the luxury of having a scale-to-zero feature that I've quickly grown beyond.

I'll reiterate that it's not the only reason why I'm moving off of them. Reliability, performance, insights, etc.

It just happens to be a lot more affordable too.

Comment · 1 year ago
Thank you for the great service!
Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 1 year ago
Pre-seed stage startup of two people. No, we can't hire a DBA.
Comment · 1 year ago
We get 750 compute hours per month across our entire org, then charged 16c per hour.
Comment · 1 year ago
Yeah, at a certain point it's just always running 24/7, which they charge you usage-based if your company is over 750 hours in a month.

If you're running databases continuously, I find a lot of their original unique selling point pretty moot, especially if you're paying them extra for it.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton