Recent submissions

Comment · 4 years ago
Probably you would have contributed more had you received something in return. It needn't be money. Could be even something else.

Humans need a reward to continue doing an action. No reward, no action.

Comment · 4 years ago
I smell blockchains here...
Comment · 4 years ago
Indeed, but most of these projects are really big & popular projects that the organization depends upon. New/Upcoming projects will still be left out due to this.

But we should also note that individual donations can make a huge difference too, if a propoer system is created around it.

Comment · 4 years ago
Yes, companies probably need to be donating more, but I also think individual donors can also do their bit.
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Like what?
Comment · 4 years ago
It seems that donation based model is not sustainable for OSS. Even the latest report of Open Collective (https://blog.opencollective.com/12m-for-open-source/) suggests that an OSS projects are receiving just ~4k USD per project in a year on an average. This is below the min-wage of many countires if you look at it at a contributor level.

Isn't there any alternative possible? This seems like a huge opportunity if solved correctly.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton