andrewnicolalde

That makes a lot of sense, and I think it’s something that would have helped me during high school.

Perhaps it means that a change to the policy can’t be used to justify actions taken that would have broken a prior version of the policy but which don’t violate the new one. Granted, I don’t have a complete understanding of the legal enforceability of a company’s privacy policy.

They do, currently!

I really hope this doesn’t happen. The relative simplicity and reliability of Google docs in my experience has always been one of its major advantages over Microsoft Office, not to mention its near seamless real time collaboration functionality.

Why unfortunate? Also, I love your username. I think many of us could have guessed that you spoke Catalan from that alone ;).

If that were feasible and comparably efficient (which I doubt), then yes, I imagine they ought to!

I suspect they were being sarcastic.

What are some examples of things which you would forget about?

Any kind of stealthiness for one. There are versions of the F-15 which attempt to be more stealthy than the base airframe, but it’s a far cry from being as stealthy as any purpose-built aircraft.

Presumably yes, for both of the same reasons, or at least the first one.

Apparently it’s not even the most realistic it could be! From the footer:

> We used Ada because titles generated by the larger Curie model are barely distinguishable from the real thing, despite being original.