amirathi
Joined 10 years ago
Joined 10 years ago
> We have heard this before, but we cannot see it or replicate it. The user gets to do work for us and/or get no resolution
Well, if you're not willing to resolve individual customer's problem then don't expect to build goodwill with just prompt reply on support!
Are we collectively in denial? It's understandable as the craft as we knew it is being disrupted by tools that have improved at an astonishing pace.
I wonder if they run the STT model's output through the current model (that we're chatting with) as a final pass - since the text seem to be well aligned to the current conversation context.
For long prompts, I often speak to OAI web/app and copy-paste the text to Claude / Gemini :)
I just let Claude write notebooks, run top to bottom, debug & fix errors & only ping me when everything is working.
The idea has a lot of merit. We even gave a talk about it in JupyterCon Paris 2023 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUYY2kHrTzs
When you have executable code in the documentation, folks want to follow PR-review workflow with the docs as well - which is a bit more team investment than editing a wiki.
Good luck!
meet.hn/city/in-Pune
Socials:
- linkedin.com/in/amitrathi1
---