alxmrs
Joined 5 years ago
Joined 5 years ago
> Sadly not, but you can get a long way before you find the limits.
I'm really curious to know what the limits are! If you have a good understanding of these, I'd love to hear your perspective. I do think it's valuable to be able to spill out to the array paradigm, and that a project like Xarray-SQL lets users choose the best tool for the job.
I am a fan of Differential Dataflow, though I don't know the system too well. I'll take a closer look when I can.
WRT ISO/IEC 9075-15:2023: This is the standard established from rasdaman, IIUC. I reject this approach (which treats arrays as a column type), and instead adopt one inspired by Michael Stonebraker's SciDB (which treats arrays as tables themselves). For an in depth review of the topic, I recommend this NSF paper: https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10545560
You’re spot on. I think that SQL, as a data oriented and logic PL, might be ideal for writing tensor programs.