alfiejohn_
Joined 15 years ago
Joined 15 years ago
I think we're beyond this point now. There is no "what we are allowed to do" vs "what we are not allowed to do". From what we have seen in the past few months, it's now a matter of "do what we want to do" and if we can't do it then we'll interpret the law.
> (a) Introduce evidence that is the product of NSA surveillance
> (b) Literally manufacture probable cause to effect a search to generate introducible evidence
There is probably even a team at the NSA whose sole purpose is parallel construction!
Thanks for all your posts.
I flagged it for my to-read list for after work. I'm an idiot and didn't RTFA.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/laura.aspThe line was crossed a long time ago when the Law was treated as an opinion. This cultivated a "let's see what we can get away with" attitude which is now starting to unfold before the world stage.
For more info, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Yoo
[email protected]