alexalvarado
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
1) Crisis situations: safety is our #1 priority. We create a safety plan that includes coping skills, strengths, local resources and people to contact. If a crisis situation arises we have this in advance as a resource. We recognize online can create more challenges than in person for maintaining a safe environment, so we also refer patients who we believe might need more intensive care to in person treatment.
2) We firmly believe telehealth is a great vehicle for psychiatry. We haven't quite arrived there yet, but it is on our 'roadmap' to have psychiatrists. And in the meantime, we refer out for teens who need medication support.
Thanks again for sharing your story!
How it practically plays out: teen members can switch between counselors on our platform if they are not satisfied with their first match. If they don't find a match that is a fit within the first few sessions, we do offer a money back guarantee.
We do also focus in the upfront assessment on gathering the input we need from both the teen AND the parent to make the matches we select higher quality. This input includes goals, needs, specialty areas, interests and hobbies -- among other inputs.
You ask a great question, and we'll add it to our FAQ. We currently refer out for the medication prescription needs, and are evaluating bringing the capability in-house.
We recognize that our current pricing, while an improvement over private practice, is still out-of-reach for much of the country. Our plan is to: 1) continue to evolve the product to reduce cost of care while maintaining quality, 2) pursue partnerships with health plans and eventually Medicaid (which covers the lowest income teens) so that our services can be offered for free to those teens. We are very open to other funding models to increase the access of our services for teens as well! I'll reach out to learn more
So to answer your question: our current product reflects what we think is the best solution to increase access to therapy while maintaining quality. Over time, as we learn more, the product could evolve to become even more accessible (e.g., more digital) if we are able to maintain quality with that solution.
One other piece I'll say on access: for a healthcare company the 'insurance plans' control the keys to access. From Day 1 an important part of our strategy is pursuing reimbursement so that the cost of our services reaches $0 for teens and families who need it and cannot afford the out-of-pocket cost. We are not there yet, but it is our goal!
I'll start by saying that we look to data to drive our perspective here. The the evidence suggests that telepsychiatry is as effective as in person therapy for adolescents (article link below), and our data actually shows that it is more engaging as measured by session attendance and number of weekly engagements than traditional therapy benchmarks. The way teens engage with the world is changing (to more digital), and rather than try to swim against the current, we hope to reach the most teens by meeting them where they are, and then changing their behavior in ways that matter. Our programs do focus on the importance of things like limiting screen time and developing healthy relationships.
Ultimately I won't disagree with you -- in-person is at least as effective and for many people can be more effective. However, what we are hoping to do is increase access to those people for whom going to an in person session might present to high a barrier, whether it be geographically, financially, or from a stigma perspective.
Article on efficacy of telepsych: https://togetherthevoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AACA...
On Pricing - our counselors are certified to practice and pass a rigorous interview process ensuring the highest quality. All are licensed to practice in California and have 5+ years experience working with adolescents. The primary differences are: 1) real estate (our therapists work from the comfort of their homes, so we don't have that cost), 2) cost of living (because we can work with therapists in varied geographies, their cost of living may be lower than in the highest demand/need geos), 3) value prop (adolescent-focused therapists want to work with us because of our flexibility and focus on teens which is rare to find)
On medication - today we refer out if patients need medication. It is an area we are actively thinking about how to better serve in house!
That said, there are three primary challenges in the online environment.
First and most simply, it is harder to create rapport online. We require for that reason that all of our teens use the video sessions (in addition to messaging and the app), and we place high importance on the match itself (which we can do since we have a group of diverse counselors across California geos). We also place high importance on the therapeutic alliance and give our counselors techniques during training to develop that online.
Second, privacy can be a challenge in small or crowded homes. We work closely and set expectations with parents to ensure that our teen clients receive privacy during their session times.
Third, online counseling is still primarily best for mild to moderate acuity. At the more severe acuity levels, or with psychotic disorders for example, we haven't yet nailed how to treat online effectively and safely. We screen members during the assessment and refer them out if in-person counseling is better. We also put an emphasis on our online safety plan, which gives us knowledge of parent whereabouts and trusted contacts in the case that a crisis situation does escalate.
Link to efficacy of telepsychiatry in adolescents: https://togetherthevoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AACA...