aledalgrande

Or I just don't wanna spend any decision capital on that? There's many apps I would never have been able to do time wise before.

I'm really curious about how you use it, because for me it was braindead. I tried tasking it to update my personal workout app and it created so many bugs I had to clean up with Opus or be left with spaghetti. It also keeps asking for confirmation of doing basic things.

I wonder how much of the world's compute/electricity is wasted in malicious bots.

For your use case have you thought about VPN into your local network, via e.g. a Synology box? It's pretty cool and easy to set up.

Was just a few days ago in a shop in Den Den town in Osaka, where they still sell original Master System, NES and PS1 games, so many memories!

W40K Machine God incoming

I love this. Great skill and also hilarious!

Your shipping container mention reminded me of The Box, a book that explains how shipping was so erratic, risky, slow, unreliable and incredibly expensive before the standardization into containers. Containers literally changed the world economy.

I think you are onto something. But this requires upfront investment, which alas, politicians are not for.

File corrupted, bad sector

I can be massively more ambitious when coding with AI, but most importantly I have zero emotional investment in the code so I can throw it away and start again whenever I want.

> Posting it on a Show HN or Product Hunt

and funnily enough, this is still marketing

"build it and they will come" doesn't work

I don't know a lot about 3D modeling, but I can see that the objects created by this AI are way too high poly, which would be bad for performance if used e.g. in a game. But it still looks like a great prototyping tool to me, especially if you want to express an idea in your head to an actual 3D designer, in the same way UX designers can show a prototype to developers with Claude code now, instead of trying to repro an idea with Figma.

I don't agree with the author. Where is the part about nondeterminism and hallucinations? Drawing a pretty chart doesn't make the argument true. All these benchmarks and competitions are on problems that have a _right answer_. I write most my code entirely through Claude at work and have Claude Max for personal, and I can see every day that even with the right context, it's not certain that the model is going to converge to a decent answer on complex real life issues. At least one thing I do agree on: model growth is not an exponential, like everyone thought when we were on the first leg of it, but a logarithmic.

The Netscape theme is my favorite. Love the pixel-y cursor animation