alchemist1e9

This is why I think there will be selective pressure for fast tools. It’s like an evolutionary process and fast tools will be preferred and created. It’s already happening and also why I think computer use is a dead end.

~245k lines of Rust the LLMs coded. So my question is other than DSH does the author(s) have any advice on setup that made creating this possible? or other have tips for best setup that can produce a project like this.

Even those bashing for being AI generated have to admit it’s technically impressive and reflective of where software engineering is headed.

Looks interesting but I’m confused if you published your source code or not.

> By hand or from source > To install by hand, download jai-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl (Linux) or jai-aarch64-apple-darwin (macOS) or jai-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc.exe (Windows), check its SHA-256 against latest.json, and put it on your PATH as jai (jai.exe on Windows). You can also build from source with cargo install --path .; those builds don't check for updates.

However I’m not able to find source code anywhere on your github.

No worries if you didn’t open source, only it seems ambiguous currently.

Not very convincing

I’d also guess bad inverter hardware could cause lots of dirty/noisy AC power effects and damage other equipment on the system. This definitely doesn’t sound like a very safe approach without a lot of conditions being met and exactly like your example there are too many ways it can go wrong.

This was stealing the seed phrases as they were being displayed so the user could make the paper backup you suggest and in the process have all their current and future coins stolen.

Wouldn’t it actually be more useful to just let such a pointless conversation continue? You would collect more information. I’m curious what the human says next that’s kinda interesting. How disturbed are they? what else will they say? Who cares what the LLM says, we know it’s just an LLM and understand what it is and what it does, however the human … lots of different type, maybe they will confess to a crime, maybe they will release their anger and be a better human. It could be cathartic.

One possibility that’s been floated is it’s about keeping their user conversations cleaner for use in training but I don’t think it can be this because that should be a fairly trivial and fast filter to apply.

However even Musk posted - “I think this is the right move. Cruelty to something that believes it is experiencing pain is not ok.”

My son brought up the fruit fly brain simulation and people torturing it.

It all seems stupid to me, we know these are just calculations and so what are they talking about?

The response I get is “we are also calculations” but firstly I don’t believe that but secondly this entire line of thinking is a dangerous anthropomorphic philosophy.

Perhaps the simplest explanation for this bizarre policy is again PR that all press is good press.

any prices anywhere for anything specific?

Orthodox and Catholic Christian theology of suffering is actually very logical. Just most people were not taught it unfortunately.

What do you find dishonest?

Exactly. Textbook definition of “Crony Capitalism”. Which isn’t actually capitalism at that point.