wr
hn
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Back
a
albuic
Joined 9 years ago
Karma
82
Submissions
49
Member since
Apr 26
Nothing
View on Hacker News
Recent submissions
Comment · 21 days ago
What you got wrong is that not all compiled languages need a runtime. Only some of them.
Comment · 22 days ago
> compiled languages require runtimes
Hmmm, no ?
Comment · 22 days ago
There is no barrier for entry to develop runtimes but there is one for maintaining it. Let's not forger that cost.
Comment · 3 months ago
That's how it works on Firefox
Comment · 3 months ago
I don't agree. JavaScript was definitly not fine when it started and because of it, people had to create multiple libraries and framework to go around differences in web-browsers. They got used to libraries and big framework as they really were necessary first. Now that JavaScript is pretty good, they are still used to frameworks and libraries which are very often unnecessary.
Comment · 3 months ago
JavaScript ?
ActivityPub over ATProto (2023)
b
berjon.com
60
albuic
3 months ago
42
comments
Comment · 5 months ago
The mainframe industry IS profitable.
Comment · 6 months ago
Indeed security and usability do contradict each other but in that case, I prefer Firefox approach for more security/privacy
Comment · 6 months ago
Most people accept without reading and thinking about the consequences. Firefox refused WebUSB to protect those people.
Comment · 6 months ago
No, native app is not platform lock-in... You just need to choose the OS correctly and also the app. The SDK for advertising can be present in both. The sandboxing does exist in OS. And you clearly loose control over the App when the website is taken down while you can still use the native app. If native platform remove support for USB or BLE, your web browser cannot use it either so no USB/BLE at all. Users can choose but native is a lot better for privacy and security if the OS and the app are chosen correctly.
Comment · 6 months ago
It bas been and that's why Firefox refused to implement it. It's good that this is done with a plugin as it is not on by default as mist people do not understand the risks. Making it more difficult offers a bit more protection for most people. Google is known for launching stuff in the webbrowser without thought from a security and privacy standpoint. They are business oriented, not privacy oriented.
Comment · 6 months ago
Agreed. Not much differences between new phones and couple years older phones if you are not doing crazy gaming on phones. At least for me but maybe some of you might have good reasons to upgrade and can tell us ?
Comment · 6 months ago
Yes you can! It was done with many phones in the past...
Comment · 7 months ago
Obviously... They are not made for safety critical systems. It's for hobbyists.