albertsikkema

Nice, will give it a try later this week!

Great idea!

Thanks, will keep that one in mind for next time!

Thanks!

Even if that was the case: is it a real problem? I am not a purist in any sense: whatever tool gets the job done, I am fine with it.

It's a pattern I see with more tools (lovable.dev does something similar). However looking at the code produced, lovable seems to be more precise about the code itself: just cleaner even over several iterations. Which is nice because it gives you a decent platform to continue on with your own code.

Funny, actually not the case. Co-authored partly yes, mainly to compensate for my lack of knowledge of the intricacies of English (not my native language). Anyway: take from it what you want, if it helps you: nice! Else: have fun doing something else.

Interesting that you feel this is necessary. Why would a disclaimer be needed? If I read the technical docs for a library and use that in my code, should I explicitly mention that I got this from the docs? I know a lot, but am happy to admit I do not know everything, so I am happy to use tools that help me. And I got what I wanted in the end: being able to continue with my real work: helping a client.

Never thought about using that, thanks for the tip!

that is a good one. Will try that next time.

That is a funny observation! You are right, that is strange.