albatruss

> Still, human history shows us that money always wins.

Are you aware of what happened to the landlords in China or do you mean the landlords weren't human?

The USA threw 100k+ of its own citizens in concentration camps, stripping them of property and leaving them in poverty after the war. Not exactly a shining moment for principles.

> Also - shouldn't the web be full off vurnurable database servers then?

No, the docker bridge network is not on a routable subnet.

Their MEGAsync client is open source at least.

Walmart makes over 200k in revenue per employee. Using profit to make your point is not applicable if honest. Otherwise you would advise Amazon to cease hiring altogether in all those years they were seemingly losing money per employee.

It's worth mentioning that it wasn't just Germany on the Axis side, but a 6 nation alliance that invaded the USSR.

I cannot cite a universally accepted definition of anything. That is an impossible standard and I'm sure nothing I say will satisfy you. The only help I can offer you here is to question the neutrality of that link.

The article concerns philosophers who loved talking about ideas, not the colloquial usage of the word stoic.

You've got it backwards. Toxic masculinity is exactly the avoidance of vulnerability and emotional openness you praise, not horsing around with your buds.

You don't have to guess on the definition by the way, as academic terms tend to be well explicated.

Something important to understand is that the hard sciences are more rigorous, but that's because they're easier to model than what the social sciences have to deal with. The naming is confusing.

How do you justify such an incredibly strong assertion?

Not good advice if you're American as your own government can always hurt you most.