akh

Joined 14 years ago

Karma
414
Submissions
196
Member since
Mar 1
Co-founder of Infracost (YC W21): Shifting FinOps Left so engineers and coding agents know the cost impact of cloud infrastructure changes before launching resources.
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 4 months ago
Thanks - indeed, it's also difficult to estimate how much the agents will cost in advance, and how much changes could reduce or increase costs.
Comment · 4 months ago
yep, the ROI for cloud and AI spend tools is fairly easy to measure: it has to save multiples of what it costs.
Comment · 5 months ago
We prevent way more than that from being added to the cloud bill by showing engineers cost estimates that enables them to make better decisions pre-deploy - e.g. when an engineer knows the IOPS option on their EC2 instance is costing them a lot, they're more likely to reduce that or not use that in dev envs vs just copy/paste what's on production. There's an ROI report on infracost.io that shows how we measure the cost prevention between the first and last commit on merged PRs.
Comment · 5 months ago
CI/CD pipelines needs 1 CLI run per commit (like any other code scanning tool), we regularly see enterprises with 100K+ runs/month.
Comment · 5 months ago
OpenRouter is great for keeping your LLM API bill down, Infracost is about the AWS/Azure/GCP bill your IaC creates. When an agent writes IaC that creates a NAT gateway or an RDS instance, that's $50-5000/mo in cloud spend, so the agent knowing that estimate and the best practices as it's generating the code can optimize it pre-deploy.
Comment · 5 months ago
co-founder of Infracost here, we launched Infracost on HN five years ago, when the CLI just generated cost estimates for Terraform. Earlier this year we were scoping a 1.0 release: the CLI would stop being just a cost-estimation tool and start surfacing the issues behind the costs: previous-generation instances, policy violations, the kinds of issues a thorough PR review would catch.

Then agent traffic started showing up, and it became clear the 1.0 scope was the right idea aimed at the wrong caller. A human reviewer reads a PR comment; an agent runs `infracost inspect --filter` ... and gets the same insight as a tabular row it can pipe into the next step. So we decided to skip our planned 1.0 release and go for 2.0, where we treated agents as a first-class citizen user of the CLI.

Along the way we picked up some interesting lessons on optimizing user token usage when designing a CLI, and we want to share them with the HN community since other CLI builders might benefit.

Comment · 1 year ago
and the vast majority of times you don't need those 2 recommendations in non-prod envs... Infracost only makes recommendations if they reduce your costs, not increase them.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton