ajiang

Joined 15 years ago

Karma
1,715
Submissions
353
Member since
Dec 22
NFTs

YC Badge: 0x760e7b42c920c2a0feb58ddd610c14a6bdd2ebea

www.twitter.com/andrewjiang https://github.com/andrewjiang

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
This makes me so tremendously sad. Danya was one of the biggest blessings to the online chess community.
Comment · 5 years ago
When the cost is directly paid by the actor, it isn't an externality. It is the literal opposite of what externality means.
Comment · 5 years ago
That's an argument for a different question, which is "should we allow people to waste electricity if they pay for it?". If your answer is that we should regulate what people are allowed to use electricity for, then we'll need to change the laws in this country.

It is very difficult to start being the moral judge for every single use of electricity. Instead, we let the free market decide in most situations. And when there are true externalities (meaning costs that borne by the broader population, e.g. car emissions) we do impose regulations to reduce those externalities.

Comment · 5 years ago
Regardless of what you think of NFTs, you have to recognize that the author's only counterargument against NFTs is that they're bad for the "rest of us" due to externalities that everyone else has to pay.

The "rest of us" don't pay for the electricity use. The ETH miners are paying for it directly. And creators and buyers are paying for it indirectly through ETH usage. It isn't an externality. That's like saying the physical art world shouldn't exist because it uses physical real estate, electricity, and raw materials to be made on -- and the rest of us pay for those things.

Is it a good use of electricity? Maybe, maybe not. That's for people to decide individually, unless we'd want to go down the moral rabbit hole of judging every single use of electricity.

Comment · 6 years ago
This is what I come to HN on the weekends for. Thanks OP.
Comment · 6 years ago
Comment · 6 years ago
Seems reasonable when your core business has been massively impacted. Being a public company can't make it easier.

Also as a startup, good sub-answer to the "Isn't Uber / Twitter / Dropbox etc working on this?". Yes, but in a market downturn, your investors want you to dig in harder while their investors want them to survive and focus on core.

Comment · 6 years ago
Anything?
Comment · 6 years ago
It likely isn't in the contract now, but it might be in the future in way form or another.
Comment · 6 years ago
This comment will not age well. I'll remind you in 14 days.
Comment · 6 years ago
Comment · 6 years ago
This is an oversimplification of why aeroponics or any form of hydroponics is great. A few of the most notable benefits:

1) Growing density - you use a lot less square footage by growing up!

2) Can grow anywhere - you control a ton of the variables due to setup indoors away from weather conditions, indoor lights, control of water and nutrients, etc.

3) The ability to very carefully fine tune the end product due to a large number of controllable inputs into the growing process (rather than spreading nutrients and water over large acres of land)

Comment · 6 years ago
The overwhelming method of communication in China is WeChat, whether that is in messaging or voice call. WeChat is the absolute most important communication medium -- this is true for all age ranges.

You statement doesn't sound ridiculous, just uninformed and lacking awareness of how people communicate in China.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton