ai4ever
Joined 2 years ago
Joined 2 years ago
Sure, this tool will improve the productivity of sw engineers, but so did the compiler which came 50 years back.
they gamed AIME by over-training the hell out of it for marketing purposes and called it done.
meanwhile, back-to-basics is broken.
productivity improvements in certain usecases are about it. it is not a giant leap which dot-com or smartphone enabled.
such a large round implies hardware for yet another foundational model. perhaps with better steering etc..
> It could make a big company feel like a startup
Nope, not true in my book. I would not like to be in any company that "selects" a small group of elites to a hawaii or las-vegas "retreat". then, said elites would propagate their new-found retreat wisdom from their cult-leader down to the plebs.
specifically, the hanes ad.. and i wonder why the hanes brand is still around whereas the motor heater brand is not.
and hotel rooms were $3 per night back then.
they are purpose building hardware for their specific application. debugging corner cases and making this robust is going to take them a decade. given that nobody else is interested in this non-standard solution, they dont have the benefit of the community debugging it, and improving on it in open-source.
appears to me to be a vanity effort as is the whole dojo project.
compilers eased the production of assembly code. that didnt reduce the need for folks coding at a different layer of abstraction.
similar to how houses are built from prefabricated components. Imagine that the AI is producing these pre-fab parts to order. But the design of the interfaces and assembly is still an art.
if you think of your job as a mason assembling bricks to build components, you are mistaken. you need to think of your job as an artist creating systems that work well built out of pre-fab components.
there is a story of how woz wrote the entire software for the early apple in assembly. nobody does that anymore. because, we have tools that produce assembly like compilers and such. that didnt take away the jobs of software engineers, because, someone had to now produce code at a different layer of abstraction.
imagine you ranting at the compiler 50 years back because it took away your job producing assembly code.
https://www.siliconrepublic.com/machines/deepmind-ai-study-c...
DeepMind is overselling their AI hand when they dont have to.
"whos to say that" - this could be a leading question for any "possibility" in the AI religion.
"whos to say that god doesnt exist" etc. questions for which there are no tests, and hence fall outside the realm of science and in the realm of religion.
These folks must all do courses in epistemology to realize that all knowledge is built up of symbolic components and not spit out by a probabilistic machine.
Gradually, reality will sync (intentional misspelling) in, and such imaginations will be seen to be futile manic episodes.
but, gen-ai is not introducing a new mode to my day-to-day life. I would liken it to a calculator app. Sure, i use it sometimes, but, it is not changing my day in any significant way yet.
But ecommerce changed the way i shop, and the smartphone changed the way i transact, and consume info and entertainment