aeontech

Joined 16 years ago

Karma
3,312
Submissions
886
Member since
Feb 16
a featherless biped

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/aeontech; my proof: https://keybase.io/aeontech/sigs/ITWRib8X6w055xVMUK6vRaEenJI_nAS8J0Flloe0Bl0 ]

email username at gmail

kismet: dfc172b9747a2945c00ed47fae2f07f7b73cb476b65f0c60580a8549bd7040f9

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 3 days ago
Imagine a fleet of these as ferries between Hawaii's islands for example. Awesome stuff, best of luck to the team!
Comment · 13 days ago
This is beautiful writing, thank you for sharing.
Comment · 1 month ago
Comment · 1 month ago
Aptera is getting pretty close to shipping first customer cars this year, or at least seems to be, while this is a one-off research prototype - I think your comment is not quite fair.
Comment · 3 months ago
I was at a trampoline park last weekend (regular kind of place, everything padded for safety, as you'd imagine).

A ten year old kid left in an ambulance, neck injury, one side of the body paralyzed at the time of the event.

I really hope the kid recovers... but I don't think I'll ever forget that image.

Yes, everything in life has risks, but I don't even want to imagine how I'd feel if my kid, or my kids' friend had a life-changing injury on a trampoline at my home.

Comment · 3 months ago
AI: "this is a known open problem, I can not solve this, sorry."

Prompt: "Can you try solving it, instead of not solving it?"

AI: "Oh, sure, here you go!"

Comment · 4 months ago
> The tendency of Wikipedia editors is that, when an article is many years old, they would rather flag it for improvement rather than simply throw away years of fellow editors' work.

That's not been my experience, tbh - in my view the deletionist fraction of the editors has essentially "won", if one can put it in those terms. I _think_ there is a (maybe small) group that have decided it is their mission to guard Wikipedia against what they view as cruft or non-notable, regardless of how many years of work these articles may have accumulated. They do not need to be paid for this - they enjoy it. Destroying is always easier than creation.

I seem to recall some study showing that the vast vast majority of edits/deletes on Wikipedia are the work of just a few hundred long-standing editors (citation needed) - which to me confirmed my gut feeling that most new editors bounce off and give up on contribution in short order.

I contributed for a few years, but gave up eventually - it was exhausting to spend time collating sources, collecting information, editing, rewriting, and then having someone come along and propose discarding your work with very little investment from their side.

Stackoverflow has gone through similar calcification - it's nearly impossible to contribute now, or build reputation as a new user, as posts get closed as duplicates or not-relevant.

Comment · 4 months ago
Hmm, that seems to contradict the article directly - insecticides were used to try to battle screwworm initially and were not really effective - the solution was using sterile male flies to stop reproduction - which would work in South America just as well as it did in North (with sufficient scale)
Comment · 4 months ago
Comment · 4 months ago
Lemma 1: you want to protect your users privacy, and are also beholden to regulation enforcing that commitment (GDPR).

Lemma 2: you are obliged by other regulation to offer equal access to user data to third parties, so others can build equivalent functionality (DMA).

Lemma 3: malicious third parties will absolutely try to abuse the access and trick the user into sharing their data by all means possible. You will be held responsible in court of public opinion at minimum and legally at maximum if/when a malicious third party abuses said access.

This is a hard, possibly technically unsolvable problem no matter how much money you might have, because the root issue is not technical, it's the fact that you legally have to give third parties access and no way to control what they do with it - and as others have mentioned in the threads, it's exacerbated by the fact that the regulation doesn't say "this is okay and this is not", it is vague and judges things "by outcome", so you may spend all the time in the world implementing a solution you think will work, and then get hit by fines/lawsuits because the implementation is judged as not sufficient after the fact.

Comment · 4 months ago
Very interesting - I just installed pg_hint_plan [0] extension a few months ago to get around a query that was confusing the planner too much. Edge case, but when you need it you really need it.

Haven't seen pg_plan_advice before, TIL!

Comment · 4 months ago
This is beautifully written - don't know how this got on HN, but thank you for sharing it.
Comment · 5 months ago
Comment · 7 months ago

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton