aarkling

That's only cause UI scaling sucks on Windows and linux. On MacOS, a 4k monitor works great.

> Practically every Fortune 500 executive will have one of these

Even if that's true, that's only like ~50k people lol.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe you can make pulls from coinable wallets provided you have enough money in there.

Yeah but that goes against their "press a button for a taxi" philosophy.

Yes in most cases it applies to all US residents. But many don't apply to non-residents who still live in the US. For Eg: international students.

What do the lines mean?

Even if it starts stagnating it will pass the US in total GDP. China has 10x the population of Japan. Not that it matters. The average Chinese will still be a lot poorer than the average American.

We're already a zombie...

Doesn't work on chrome for me.

The US and Lesotho are the only countries in the world that taxes foreign income.

Maybe they meant $42.5 million in profit?

I think the difference is it may be more expensive to live in a city but may still make sense because of the availability of jobs and higher income. With basic income the income aspect of choosing a place to live is weakened.

you'll still need electricity for your laptop, microwave, fridge etc.

> considering that land (and property) is more or less in fixed supply, SF could justifiably implement price/rent controls.

> Supply can be increased pretty easily

First you say supply can't be increased. Then you say it can. No it's not Google's fault there is not enough supply. It's bad zoning laws that limit the number and size of buildings. And rent control that makes building less profitable.

Houston and Austin get a way bigger influx of people and even money (for Houston at least) than San Francisco but they don't have these problems.