> considering that land (and property) is more or less in fixed supply, SF could justifiably implement price/rent controls.
> Supply can be increased pretty easily
First you say supply can't be increased. Then you say it can. No it's not Google's fault there is not enough supply. It's bad zoning laws that limit the number and size of buildings. And rent control that makes building less profitable.
Houston and Austin get a way bigger influx of people and even money (for Houston at least) than San Francisco but they don't have these problems.
> Supply can be increased pretty easily
First you say supply can't be increased. Then you say it can. No it's not Google's fault there is not enough supply. It's bad zoning laws that limit the number and size of buildings. And rent control that makes building less profitable.
Houston and Austin get a way bigger influx of people and even money (for Houston at least) than San Francisco but they don't have these problems.