aargh_aargh

Joined 11 years ago

Karma
1,235
Submissions
478
Member since
May 21
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 month ago
Isn't that why we invented faceless corporations in the first place?
Comment · 1 month ago
I'm just a regular Joe, no font expertise.

Sorry for the brutal honesty, just thought it might offer you an explanation of the difference in reaction.

OP's fonts look ugly, but intentionally and purposefully so, in a nails-on-chalkboard manner. In contrast, your example images just look plain ugly to me, can't imagine I would have any use for them.

Sorry again. I do understand the technological fascination with the process, just describing the aestheticity of the result here.

Comment · 1 month ago
Comment · 4 months ago
That's a nice digital content you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it...
Comment · 5 months ago
First impressions assuming the goal is to replace the incumbent SQL. Haven't seen the language yet.

  * D4M rolls off the tongue
  * Make me buy a book to see the language.
Comment · 5 months ago
I've seen this delay in action when logging in into an old dormant Google account. After I provided correct password (and some other details I remember vaguely - probably no phone number set and some problem with using the TOTP I set up long ago), it sent an email to the linked primary email and waited for a day to give it a chance to abort before logging me in.

The delay is quite a bother but it's surely better than account takeover. What I mind about the process is probably the lack of transparency - what combination of factors (MFA pieces, location, inactive time, ...) launches which process? I get that transparency might help attackers here but they're the ones to have the persistence to figure out the rules anyway. Smells like security through obscurity to me.

Comment · 5 months ago
I had no idea what traces are in this context. While looking, I found this post from @OpenRouter:

https://x.com/OpenRouter/status/2041193329270878707

  > Privacy:
  > 
  > Private I/O logging and the 1% data sharing discount are separate settings. You control each independently.
  > 
  > Input & Output Logging stores prompts and completions for your use only and makes them visible in your logs. OpenRouter does not access this data. You can configure it in your observability settings.
  > 
  > As always, more in the docs!
https://openrouter.ai/docs/guides/features/input-output-logg...

https://openrouter.ai/docs/guides/features/broadcast/overvie...

Comment · 6 months ago
The practical concern of Linux developers regarding responsibility is not being able to ban the author, it's that the author should take ongoing care for his contribution.
Comment · 7 months ago
Huh, I guessed all correct. Random guess would have a 1/(2^5) = 1/32 chance of being correct.

I don't make any claim to any special hearing or expertise. I've been listening to practically only lossy music since around '98, ripping from CDs at that time.

Morricone and Vangelis have been especially hard for me to tell apart, could have been a random guess on my part (I listened to those ~20 times).

When I read the title I expected to hear the actual _difference_ between the lossless and lossy waveform - i.e. only the actual artifacts. Could be a fun exercise.

Comment · 8 months ago
Comment · 9 months ago
I still can't get over the Apple thing. Haven't enjoyed a ripe McIntosh since. </s>
Comment · 9 months ago
Comment · 10 months ago
Honest question/thought - at this point where we have all HTTP requests for a site just redirecting everything to HTTPS, we use HSTS and browsers default to trying https when scheme is not given, why don't we just stop serving on port 80 altogether? Why even bother with HSTS?
Comment · 10 months ago
Or, the obligatory RFC 1149 (IP over Avian Carriers).

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton