a9t9
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
"Freemium is a harder model to implement in open source, since the source is, well, open, but we do see this in things like WordPress...."
=> Just to add another flavor: The Freemium model is working well for us even so we are not SaaS.
In our case, the main part of the RPA software is open-source (GPL) and free. All Internet access is only done within the open-source core.
The features of this core app can be extended by local native apps for Mac, Linux and Windows. These are proprietary/closed source.
The add-on module is available in a limited free and paid fully featured version. It is the classical freemium model, which works well for both, the extension creators and the users.
With WebGL it was ~0.5s on a "good" machine and ~6s or "did not work at all" on a "bad" machine. We never figured out why it worked well on one machine, but not so on others. Of course, I am talking only about machines with WebGL enabled ;) This would have been a support nightmare.
With WebAssembly we are now in the 0.1-0.5s range per image search and it just works. So far, we have had exactly 0 WA-related support issues, for both, Chrome and Firefox.
Whatever we tried before, it was either too slow (pure Javascript), too unreliable (WebGL) or required 3rd party installations (C++). Finally, switching to WebAssembly solved all these problems.
I have been to Startup Alley once with my previous company. We managed to get exactly 0 new customers out of it. So on this point, totally agree with you. I did not expect tons of new business, but not getting a single new customer was disappointing, especially since the product sold well otherwise.
However, I got a surprising amount of good discussions out of it, both at the booth and over lunch. And I had fun. So overall, it was worth the price if you factor in the inspirational component.
According to the SEO Guru(s), this brings a SEO advantage https://moz.com/community/q/moz-s-official-stance-on-subdoma...
And/or: What I do is to have one Chrome profile for important websites (e. g. online banking) and another one for the casual web surfing. This "casual" profile is where I try out all new extensions. And only the ones I really need are used in the "secure" profile as well.
For bug reports and feature requests you can email us (team AT a9t9.com) or simply open a github ticket: https://github.com/A9T9/Kantu-for-Chrome/issues
In Chrome, you first navigate to the page that you want to automate/test, and then start record.
For use with the Firefox Selenium IDE, use the "HTML" export (not JSON). Then, in the Firefox IDE, you can import these macros simply via the "Open" menu.
https://a9t9.com => https://ui.vision/
https://ocr.space
Email:
m AT a9t9 dot com