a0zU

They don't even use more methodological evaluations of fine-tuned LLMs, they use metrics that are specifically built to support a (false) contrarian conclusion in order to generate attention for their "paper."

>Grammatical error in the abstract.

Even disregarding the sonic boom, why would we even want mediocre civil pilots to have access to aircraft thag are necessarily more dangerous and more destructive in the event of a crash?

That's interesting, but there's actually this other philosopher who published a very similar idea sometime around ~1921? I can't remember his reasoning(something about the world being a collection of facts) but I've heard that his thesis actually entirely rejected continental philosophy on similar claims to your own and singlehandedly began the shift towards the analytic philosophy that you seem to be so partial to. I think his name sounded similar to Wittingstein?

That is going to make some very expensive scotch.

Can you qualify that?

It turns out the SC devs have spent this whole time solving every fundamental problem in physics to create perfect immersion.

Based

How is this better than RTP?

Yeah but they still have a police force.

Yes, well documented in psychology, a field whose professionals even acknowledge as a psuedoscience, if a useful one.

>Particularly stable people will sit around the median boundary.

Ok, so you're saying it is more than just a boolean then?

Ok?