_xrjp

If your affirmation is true, why many of HN users (me included) get [dupe] at first place? In general, Is not the HN intention to decrease number of duplicates? If not so then HN should provide a solution for prevent this, such prevention that is not happening today. Example search input.

Sorry but I'm seeing big contradictions in the so called rules.

Just one example:

> If a story has not had significant attention in the last year or so, a small number of reposts is ok. Otherwise we bury reposts as duplicates.

> "in the last year or so"

Not in the same month or even after some hours later.

> "a small number of reposts is ok"

Well, HN what to prevent duplications or not ?

> Dupes are not against the rules. You're likely getting downvoted by people aware of that.

With that premise in mind, let's continue making duplicate content. right?

So don't misunderstand me, since my intention here is just to put in evidence the same recurrent problem to improve HN. For instance I have also faced the same problem in the past so there is nothing agains rules or things like that, but instead is more a improvement for HN.

The reason because I'm interested on this is because I feel part of the community and this is a concern for me (I suppose for others too). Otherwise I could take the easy and dirty way to just say nothing and ignore the problem.

Agree.

Probably no so related but your comment remembered me some friends sentence, something like: "end-users don't mind about the technical aspects they just want something that works".

This is an ad-hoc claim and not necessarily true, I know. But turns out that this sentence is trivial nowadays with this such of big impact of technology in people's lives. So users are not foolish, they are every day more aware about software in general. They know what they want and can give you the value that your software deserves so just let's start to tell them more about Linux.

FYI: The original title of the post is "The Gates to Hell: Apples Notarizing" evidencing the frustration involved with the notarization process and which now was relativised to just "Apple’s Notarizing".

Honestly I never have seen such piece of crap like "Notarization". One of the Apple's failures ever (if is not the most one).

A nightmare (and not cheap) to deal with it as a developer.

If unikernel offers excellent performance, faster boot times, throughput and memory consumption. I'm curious what are the benefits of VMM (Firecracker) in contrast to unikernel? Are not those two comparable?

May you elaborate why virtualization provides a layer of security and isolation that containers still haven't (and maybe never will)?