ZsoltT
Joined 2 years ago
Joined 2 years ago
you interface with a machine to get the machine to do what you, a human, want it to do relevant to your human purposes
but out of necessity - turns out we need to control a lot of machines - we made the act ergonomic
this fit the aesthetic of some people. All to do with them and little to do with the act. Akin to alchemists or other purveyors of exotic knowledge, the relevance of their skill always had a countdown on it
all that's left is to circle back. Coding is instrumental. Now our alchemy is one more level abstracted from the artifice of the machine. Good. It's closer to people now - like management, now. That's bad for the current generation of alchemist but good for the world
earnest RIP. On the upside, there's always a next generation
GPT5 did the differentials for the complex mishmash of autoimmune symptoms, found the unrelated cause for the cognitive stuff. The cognitive symptoms do match autoimmune diseases too - lupus and MS - but it split them out and discovered a cause anyway
My neurologist ran tests reasoned out purely by GPT5, agreed they made sense. They were the right tests to do
It also interpreted my ~50 blood tests correctly. Oh also my contrast MRI images
Unrelatedly, it made a loved one's bipolar I a non-issue (yeah really). They live a perfectly ordinary life
OpenAI does monitor activity on their dev forum but immediately actioning issues surfaced there isn't common (or, ehh, a reasonable degree of agility to expect on balance either). Major props to the mod Eric who pinned this topic until Thursday, but that's about all somebody outside OpenAI can do.
No matter! Can we get a thing to happen?
lord