Recent submissions

Comment · 10 years ago
Comment · 10 years ago
Comment · 10 years ago
Health eFilings | REMOTE | Senior Backend Engineer | http://healthefilings.com/

Health eFilings software enables physicians who provide better care to get paid more money.

We are looking for innovative, self-starting software developers to create additional and manage existing back end integrations with Electronic Heath Record (EHR) systems as well as working with the team to continuously develop and improve our current and future software products.

We believe in working smarter not harder: much of our backend code is “meta-“ code that parses government specifications and then generates our actual code from that.

This position has large amounts of autonomy, and you are held accountable for results, not process. You will have the opportunity to grow into management or tech leadership. This position reports to the CTO.

See http://healthefilings.com/careers/ for more information.

Comment · 11 years ago
Comment · 11 years ago
Comment · 12 years ago
Comment · 12 years ago
Generally researchers identify industries by using a code system like [NAICS](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Industry_Classif...). My guess is that the Google founders would not have been in a similar industry code, but I'm not familiar enough with Stanford to say for sure.
Comment · 12 years ago
I would disagree with the causality. The sort of person who can get an influential job in a top-tier startup is probably also the sort of person who can start a good company.
Comment · 12 years ago
> Most entrepreneurs arise out of an idea.

And how did you get that idea? How did you get the experience to see that there was an unfilled need in the marketplace?

People who have experience in a field perceive their risks as lower (correctly!) and are therefore more likely to start a company. It is a perfectly rational decision and is unrelated to risk tolerance.

Comment · 12 years ago
I think this is in interesting point (modulo the remark made elsewhere about "assuring" success), but I don't have the evidence to know how it should affect your decisions.

The research I cited found that first time and failed entrepreneurs have a 20% chance of success, whereas "skilled" entrepreneurs have a 30% chance of success. So if you can become "skilled" in one stint of employment, then you would expect to succeed sooner by being employed first than if you were doing startups that whole time.

But it's entirely possible that it takes multiple stints of direct employment to obtain whatever knowledge makes you skilled, in which case your argument is valid. I just don't know of any evidence about this though.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton