WmyEE0UsWAwC2i
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
* Here is the most popular results that are slightly relevant to your query. E.g. African war lord will pull up a gamer playing pranks on other gamers.
* Then, we give up. Here is some unrelated videos we hope will distract you searching what you are looking for.
Is this what tech should look like? Search has been purposely broken.
This is the greatest flaw in markets. It's said that markets compute the right values for trade goods. But it should be qualified to: Value now (or in the short term).
In any specific moment value has certain dispersion due to multiple factors. The uncertainty of value in the future is huge because those factors compound.
My point is that I believe markes only work in the short term. For long term planning (~one huamn lifetime, a civilization life time) markets don't work.
I think their should.
I've seen projects (on GitHub, won't call them out) get bad reputation when the maintainer implements code previously submitted as a PR.
I feel a bit of guilt knowing that a whole civilization had to fall to produce each of these episodes. This is really expensive to produce!
1. It costs money
2. It makes the product worse(slower, less portable,etc...) for your _ paying _ customers.
3. It doesn't work if the game is good.
Just add a copyright note on the corner and make sure to have good distribution. ...
sum = 0
opt = getOptional(n)
sum = sum + opt.orElse(0);
...
Also maybe use something like OptionalInt (but for long).I hope they can survive this.
Quotes can be redefined to an arbitrary string
changequote(`[[[', `]]]')
And some editor give you syntax highlighting.So I see the intent, but not the logic
1. There is little correlation, but there is actual causation (e.g: a cricle)
2. There is correlation, but it turns out to be a fluke later during validation.
So, yes. It suggests but in both cases I'd rather continue checkcing
1. Sleep quality 2. Nutrition quality 3. Exercise 4. Lifestyle
First make sure that all the above is in check.