Total_Meltdown
Joined 15 years ago
Joined 15 years ago
I mean, anarcho-capitalism is basically what sovereign nations are at a smaller scale: Factions of humans who make decisions without any real checks on their behavior beyond the environment and the reactions of other factions. And I'm supposed to want a microcosm of global politics in my back yard? No thanks, taxes are fine, please fix the roads so I can get to Chipotle.
The only reason I could see for anyone wanting anything approaching individual sovereignty is if a) they somehow believe that there is no bigger fish in the pond, or b) they're really so naive to have no idea what other people could be capable of doing to them.
From Chapter 3, Exhibit 6:
{
"title": "Hey Jude" // <-- Missing comma
"group": "Beatles",
...
}I know, I know, I hate it too. We're working on it. Just wanted to share the workaround.
[1] http://wiki.nginx.org/CommandLine#Loading_a_New_Configuratio...
[2] http://www.mgoff.in/2010/04/18/haproxy-reloading-your-config...
The question does not say cut "into thirds," it says "into three pieces." This - http://i.stack.imgur.com/kEjP0.png - is a perfectly reasonable answer which, assuming the rate of cutting is constant, would result in 15 minutes.
It's a bad question.
Edit: That said, I would have given the same answer as the student, because I think that's the most reasonable interpretation, especially considering the illustration. But the keyword there is "interpretation." The question is ambiguous.
(My argument is taken from this answer: http://math.stackexchange.com/a/380007 )
2) I would really like to see if there are any mentors relevant to my interests before I have to make yet another account on yet another website.
3) I really think mentorship is the best way to really become good at a skill. Hope it goes well for you.
Edit: And if it was a bug, they've taken their sweet time fixing it. I can still right click -> Save Image As.
> The poor students weren't poor students because they were female, or because they were non-white, but because they were unintelligent and/or uneducated.
And why is that? If you reject the absurd notion that there's some causative relationship between technical ability/intellect and gender/race, what's the explanation, other than the possibility that those people didn't have the same exposure to the subjects that you did? And that's not even including the confidence factor: Of course a white dude can do this stuff, they do it all the time. Your story seems to suggest we should actually be doing this long before university. I would agree with that.
This part will probably be unpopular, but I'll say it anyway: What makes you so special, that your life is the one that gets to be changed? If we were all on equal footing, who says you're even good enough for your university geek-kid program anyway? Or me, for that matter - I was part of a similar program in high school[1]. What if we could be fifty years ahead of where we are now, if only we had an environment that was actually competitive across the whole breadth of our society, rather than jokers like you and me running the ship?
[1] http://www.usfirst.org/