TOR_USER_01
Joined 3 years ago
Joined 3 years ago
> The SEC charged the company with failing to inform customers about payments it received from trading firms to route customer orders through them, a move that resulted in customers paying higher prices to execute trades.
> Robinhood customers' orders were executed at prices that were inferior to other brokers' prices," the SEC found.
https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/robinhood-pay-65-ml...
> The customers think they have no cause for complaint, because they did better than the NBBO. The whole thing is an institutional equivalent of retail payment for order flow: The partner firms fill the customers at a better price than the NBBO, make some profit for themselves, and kick back some of it to the broker (Coda).
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2021-09-23/money-...
> ...the company has quietly been laying the groundwork to become a standalone market maker,
> One way to reduce its reliance on PFOF is for Robinhood to actually match its own order flow instead of selling it to other brokers, company executives said. They even hinted during the roadshow meetings with investors that they too will be looking at getting into the business…
https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/robinhood-ipo-twist-busi...