SirIsaac
Joined 5 years ago
Karma
36
Submissions
53
Member since
Jul 27
Recent submissions
Comment · 3 years ago
Haha, Hi there.
Comment · 3 years ago
Another equally plausible MOND model is one in which the gravitational constant G increases with distance. This is what is observed in the orbits of stars around the center of a galaxy.
Of course, this is a pseudo-increase caused by, you guessed it, dark matter.
Comment · 3 years ago
Sooner or later, the physics community will come to their senses and realize that every massive particle is surrounded by its own dark matter halo. This is the reason that measurements of the gravitational constant G suffer from a high uncertainty problem not seen with other physics measurements.
Then it will become obvious that the halo is a neutral electric field created by real photons, not virtual photons.
Rebel Science
Comment · 3 years ago
The problem with MOND is that it's just math. It doesn't explain anything in terms of cause and effect because it doesn't have a physical basis. The problem with the cold dark matter model is that it posits a massive, slow moving particle. A slow massive particle would be attracted to other bodies and to other dark matter particles and form clumps in orbit. This is not observed.
There's a better hypothesis that not only explains the cause of gravity, but also posits that dark matter consists of positive and negative electric photons that continually radiates from all massive particles. Lots of it. They can't be detected electrically because their net effect is neutral but they still cause gravity.
https://medium.com/@RebelScience/demystifying-gravity-and-da...
Comment · 4 years ago
The biggest problem with DL is its inherent inability to effectively generalize. Without generalization, edge cases are an insurmountable problem, something that the autonomous vehicle industry found out the hard way after wasting more than $100 billion by betting on DL.