S-E-P

How? I've been running k3.1 Pro with K2.8 preview for codegen (subagents) and I've only used 22% of my weekly and it's been running for 8 hours on a RE project.

Are you using k3 with thinking set to the absolute highest and only using k3 for everything?

should be running much faster on firefox and safari now. It was an issue with OPFS

good to know; I'm still troubleshooting a lot of the hot paths but hopefully it runs a bit faster within a week or so

Works well on Chrome, can't speak much for other browsers

The notion that AI is outperforming reasoning skills of humans is a wild take.

I'm not sure if you the author knows how LLMs function, but "reason" is debatable at best.

I will give you that this instance is extreme.

How does being critical of AI directly connect to a spurious association with antifa or any connection to a riot or shooting?

These two categories are different. I agree there is overreach in Sanchez's case however i don't know how one can assume the same will happen to some guy saying "AI bad"

If they were rioting; or connected to a rioting group, that might be different.

you make it more than it is.

we are not Russia nor China thankfully, any litigation at this stage against an AI critic would fall flat.

In the future, maybe? However in the current climate it's just a bunch of empty words like the rest of the admin has been

Well yeah, but I'm pretty sure there was another breach around 2016 that had similar info from the FBI

Hasn't that db been pwned previously?

It is pretty funny to me that the transhumanist movement is hoping that these LLMs can eventually move past a parody of human intelligence.

A lot of weird folks in that arena, a lot of strange books too that they wrote for the consumption of the public. It's always the same backstory too.

this u?

> AI will replace all of them soon.

What is that spaghetti of words you tied together to form a sentence? Were you trying to be comprehensible?

It's sad that reading has become that way for you.

I love reading, but I mostly read non-fiction and I'm a bit of an amateur history buff. Last time I read a fiction book I was left feeling like I was preached to by an alien about how life doesn't really matter (sci-fi authors will often do that). The state of literature is pretty dire.

> If someone is spreading deception, intentionally or not, then it's entirely within my rights to point out they are without engaging further.

What is it with millennials and "rights"? It's a sincere question. People don't owe you anything and neither do you owe me anything, sure... so why do you demand another have a higher standard that you yourself hold to. I know you don't hold yourself to that standard because you would rather nitpick someone on a single inaccuracy then grapple with a very real issue (which you yourself would not appreciate if they did that to you). The respectable thing to do is to note the inaccuracy and approach the valid portion of the argument sincerely.

What you demonstrate is a lack of care for those around you, and a lack of care for what is actually true. You would rather "umm actually" then treat others with an ounce of respect. It's shameful and devoid of grace.

I fear in the future people will read even less because of how often people cheap out and use AI to write. I know the author of this article tells you never to use a single word it suggests, however I still, while reading, am checking for any amount of AI used. This makes reading less enjoyable, and even a bit stressful.

If you can't spend the time to write it, why should anyone read it?

Everything I post is from my own finger tips, only to get a reply from someone using a bot. I'm tired.