RandVal30142
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
Make me.
"I think we can successfully make Zcash too traceable for criminals like WannaCry, but still completely private & fungible"
"I _don't_ mean weakening security (https://z.cash/support/faq.html#backdoor …). I mean that a secure protocol layer is compatible with good law enforcement." -zooko
Not sure how your statements carry water in the face of that comment.
Who are you talking to?
Bring me to court about that one.
The garbage is likely where Zcash belongs.
Trump did run pandering to conservative wishes to defund the EPA. Trump won and is defunding the EPA. So yes.
> Or do they want to reduce some of the more obscure, less clearly useful regulations?
So obscure they involve the primary budget for the office and the main regulations enacted by them during Obama's time.
Who was I commenting to? You or the user whose post my comment showed up under?
> So let's have all those examples
But that is not what you asked for. Try again, smarter not harder.
Why would I alter my comment to be in tune with what you want when I was responding to this:
>Exactly what environmental protection is Trump rolling back?
>There are many thousands of regulations. They don't all make sense. They're not all necessary.
"Soooo many regulations, we couldn't possibly need all of these. Ignore the specific few discussed here lets make it about allllll these redundant regulations."
Not very smooth.
You're making up a false narrative.
If I want to report on a post by say some scrubby Islamic State propagandist I'm going to do it. They can ban me but it will just become part of the reporting. Then give me a few minutes and I'll be back on the site doing my thing again.
Terrible terms of service don't make a private garden. Neither does IP/phone number fingerprinting. I agree with you though, it is not that complicated.