QML
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
What I have heard before is: - more resource-efficient and green since livestock farming requires a lot of feed and has a higher carbon footprint than all vehicles combined, and - that it's less cruel than raising animals to be slaughtered.
In terms of economics, a cheaper meat substitute would just mean a cheaper source of protein for people, comparable to eating vegetables.
As a side note, does anyone know why Paul Graham has been talking about economic inequality recently? Is it just politics season and that this is a debate issue?
Edit: Fibonacci may be a specific example, but I wondered how much wasted computation has been spent on calculating the same problem on the same input.
Beyond the medical field and lawyers, what other fields do you believe that qualifications is a solved problem? Mind that a certification itself can also be cost prohibitive — that’s ok if it can be amortized over many apps though.
I would also like to mention that the UC system is one of the more open, impactful universities when compared to the privates.
🧠