PrettyPebble

So far, all tests of the strand tangle model are positive. It agrees with all of textbook physics.

By the way, I offer an invitation to dinner to everybody who has a good argument for or against the theory of everything presented in the text.

Agree with all observations

The common constituents of space and particles must be extended, reach up to the cosmological horizon, and be of Planck radius.

This yields the modern version of Dirac's scissor trick and thus yields the Dirac equation. The constituents also yield the gauge interactions and the different elementary particles - all as observed. Also general relativity with the field equations arises. So it seems that all of nature is described with Dirac's idea.

Simple arguments, almost no math, lead to the common constituents of space and particles, and thus to the unified theory.

Based on Battey-Pratt and Racey, 1980. There seems to be no other visualization of wave functions in the research literature that agrees with observations.

Presents a way to picture how wave functions arise. Explains interference, entanglement, probabilities, and decoherence, as well as the Schrödinger equation and the Dirac equation.

Thank you. It seems that no other option except strands can explain both space and particles. It appears that a smallest length and a smallest area cannot arise in any other way.

Maybe you have to shift a bit more ...

If you try to produce more power than c⁵/4G at a single point, a black hole horizon appears and will make exceeding the limit impossible.

In nature, the maximum power value c⁵/4G ≈ 9 ⋅ 10⁵¹ W cannot be exceeded, as stated by Sciama in 1973. Still not much known, the value limits the power of explosions, the luminosity of stars and that of merging black holes. It is also a simple summary of general relativity.