PassageNick
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
I think the biggest barrier to adoption is lack of end user demand for the service. That is followed by people not understanding/believing the incredible increase in user experience and security. It's almost like people think it is too good to be true.
Biometrics are very difficult to impossible to reproduce short of physical coercion.
Something you have (your device) Something you are (your biometric)
Those are definitely two factors that are required to be together for passwordless to work
This isn't the case. Nothing about passkeys says you need your phone to login on a website with your laptop, for instance.
What happens if someone invents a better interface than USB 3.0?
Or better, why would anyone bother when a better interface couldn't be used?
Each passkey is a modest amount of data, and I don't see a person having so many passkeys that the TPM gets full.
Apple's changes do degrade security, but I think it is important to note that even with those degradations, Apple passkeys are still many orders of magnitude more secure than passwords.
Currently, you cannot move them to other devices without the cooperation of some cloud service, or the like. At some point you'll have to trust someone to move passkeys between devices.
I'm not a yubikey expert, but I don't believe that losing your Yubikey will open up your company to a breach.
For a typical passwordless solution, losing your phone isn't a risk, given that no one can reproduce your face or thumbprint.
The "Big Three" are on the FIDO board, along with 1Password. They can't really do the extinguish thing, and it really isn't in their interst to do so.
An no, the small tweaks don't kick anyone out of the game.
There will be other, perhaps more trusted, companies that you can use to move your passkeys around between eco-systems.