NwmG

They can indeed censor, I think what the prior poster was saying is that if they choose to censor, their regulation changes.

I don't think it says games owned, it just says games... Maybe a recent change?

Super interesting.

I have a question on the main product - doesn't pushing the link to email just pass the password breach potential to the email provider?

definitely understand the reduction of attack vectors but does it not consolidate the risk?

if anyone is interested in this topic of how these things happen and the general lawlessness of the seas due to tragedy of the commons I highly recommend Outlaw Ocean by Ian Urbina

You might want to note that you can test it on the testnet. It looks like it works, i did it using ropsten testnet but the verbiage in the posting says mainnet regardless of if it is actually the mainnet.

why can you put in negative numbers as the amount?

this exists - localbitcoins.com

I would say it is not actually a mixer. The point you are making actually points more towards them being temp addresses for exchanges. More people entering the market on exchanges, higher volume in exchanges, higher volume in this tempwallet "mixer"

Yeah, this was my thought as well. 67% of all ETH transaction volume in a mixer seems pretty high, particularly when you consider the volume traded on each of the exchanges

>the U.S. Army approached MIT with a request: Can somebody build a powered device that can pull somebody up a rope, like Batman does?

does the gov't publish these requests?