Nginx487

On such a distance solar panels won't make any difference. Sun looks like just a very bright star from that far.

I don't say it didn't happen before. I know about these occasions and I find it sick how Americans put personal gain ahead of survival of their nation (yes, both in WWII and now stakes were that high).

Those from the West who don't like the truth I'm saying - I am actually Russian, know my country better than you, and I DESPISE every American who supports our regime or just ready to deal with it like with some civilised entity. Fascist dictatorship you deal with has nothing but hatred towards your state and your nation. Every dollar you pay them will come back will to you in form of terror attacks and deaths of your people, directly of through proxy conflicts.

I'm sure during WWII there were anti-Nazi Germans who felt the same for example towards IBM, who had lucrative contracts with the system of concentration camps of Third Reich.

Strange how it's a subject for discussion. It's like during WWII consider paying to operator of gas chamber in Aushwitz.

After 2 years of war, Europe expressed mild concern

Would you remind when US committed genocide, mass execution of POWs, execution and torture of civilians, mass rape of women and children, and absolutely widespread looting in occupied towns? I'm waiting.

Whoever did it, shame on European countries who buy gas from the nation whose army rapes children and wipes out peaceful towns.

For the small startups, who don't have time for BS like leetcode, I advise asking the candidate's code first of all. The senior-level developer almost definitely should have GitHub with his portfolio- or pet-projects. After carefully looking through his code, it becomes 100% clear do we want to talk to him or not. After that we usually had one interview, something like system design + soft-skills. Subjectively, I recall the hiring experience as very successful compared to what I experienced interviewing people for major tech companies according to their guidelines.

I have a counterexample. One member of our team tried to adopt Vim as a primary development tool for Python projects, while rest of the team used products of JetBrains. On the course of two months he tried to set up all linters, static analyzers and refactoring tools to keep up with the rest of the team, being the most unproductive developer all this time. When it became clear it won't be better, he was asked not to play cool hacker and use appropriate tools to solve the problem. End of story.

Why "unfortunately"? When space program of basically bigger size North Korea suffers of brain drain and incompetence, it's a good thing by all means (I'm Russian myself)

Software developers tend to love things that give them challenges and material for mental workouts, and it's fine.

However, it has nothing to do with commercial software development, where system architects should think not only about the "coolness" of technology, but also about people who will support the final product. And team leaders think about how hard it would be to hire people who know how (and are willing!) to work with the said "cool technology", and since we are talking about statements like "I have developed a custom software stack designed around memory safety", i.e. non-standard solution with no documentation, (while there are alternatives, where memory safety assumed to be as a pre-requisite, not as an implementation artifact), actually, "close to zero".

I was writing in C and classic C++ for 17 years, and I admit it is fun and challenging to design and implement systems using these tools. However, when in my team we have a library that we're expected to develop and write in C, I rewrite it in modern C++17 (I don't say "in Rust" exactly because of the second reason, but modern C++ is safer than old C by an order of magnitude), and the process rarely takes not more than 1 week. As a result its source code usually becomes about 10 times smaller, implementation faster in 80%, and the team is spared of wasting their time exploring undocumented solutions written decades ago.

We, Apple users, won the battle. Nothing more to add.

As an ethnic Russian, I completely support it. Barbaric Putin's regime should not be treated as a legitimate state.

If there's no specific restriction in the license agreement, AI can use your code to study. If you don't like it, close your repo. End of story.

Examples of "copied code" provided are pathetic. It's like acquisition of stealing `i` variable from `for` cycle.

Where to sign a petition against luddites?

They stole my `i` variable from `for` cycle.