Recent submissions

Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
Changing the context to voice markup doesn't in any way change or address the core point, which is that you really seem to be expressing that you only care about the way that you happen to consume text and therefore any other viewpoints are superfluous. Also that you're willing to go out of your way to create and publish a plugin to effectively sabotage anyone trying to do anything else.

Of all the opinions someone could hold strongly, that's certainly one of them.

Comment · 2 years ago
As a (relatively, though age is catching up with my vision, admittedly) able-bodied Westerner who reads no other languages than English, I find this opinion shocking. Would paraphrasing your point as, "I don't think anyone who reads in any way other than the one I'm familiar with deserves knowledge," have a different impact, or does that seem ok to you, too?
Comment · 3 years ago
The answer to "Why did Google do ____?" is _always_ - and has always been - because it was better in the long run for Google.
Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
Exactly. Apple's lack of contribution to the internet ecosystem exactly aligns with their profit motive: Selling hardware.

Google's involvement in the internet ecosystem exactly aligns with their profit motive: Putting relevant ads in front of individuals based upon data they've gleaned from relatively "un-sexy" sources like search, analytics, libraries, font hosting, email, chat, etc.

I'm not opposed to companies making a profit. I try, however, to keep in mind conflicts of interest when choosing my sources of information. Everything anyone at Google says about the web is suspect because that is a conflict of interest. Google, as an organization, exists to turn web traffic into profit and should always be considered accordingly.

Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
I can't wait to try this. I understand why folks praise III, but II remains my favorite for the art style and slightly smaller scope.
Comment · 4 years ago
The only problem in this scenario is being the type of person who always drinks the same wine.
Comment · 4 years ago
"Transcendent" might be my new favorite way to describe my old favorite application.
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
I just ran into this myself and came to see if others ran into it. I'm blocked (while logged in, with strict settings and NoScript) on Firefox Developer Edition, but it's working on a relatively default (and not logged in) version of plain old Firefox.

{ Edit: tried both old and www with the same results. }

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton