Kinrany

Yes, they basically asked for LARP. It'd be more interesting to give them a shared goal while also asking to survive.

It should probably be X$ per alarm regardless of it being false or not, minus first N per year.

And of course the whole point of tools is being superhuman, compared to humans without those tools. E.g. compilers are better than humans at converting C into assembly. "Just a tool" doesn't mean much.

> rather than a super human intelligence

That's a strawman (or at least a weakman): only a very small number of people (perhaps overrepresented online) thinks current agents are superhuman at programming in practice.

Which is of course not the same group as those who expect new models to become superhuman in months/years.

Open source projects themselves have reputation, regardless of how they are governed specifically.

Simpson's paradox?

If it was true, then companies would offer less and less money until it stopped being true

It's a good default for a pre-1.0 tool that aims to type check existing code.

It's never going to be embeddable, no?

Is there a project that does all of these together?

- embeddable like sqlite

- clustered like dqlite

- has a standalone node like rqlite

- can be backed up to S3 like litesteeam

- optionally AP like cr-sqlite alongside CP

The same goes for electricity. The utility is extremely useful, but it's a utility and is priced as such.

This will happen once the models are good enough, though it will take some kind of cartel to prevent the public from doing the same or distilling the models.

Because selling access to models will not be a good business. But they can form a cartel and keep frontier models to themselves. This will also prevent distillations.

I'll settle for git operations and PR merges not breaking.