Karlozkiller

Why're everybody commenting about it being a 737? It's one of the most common, stable and widely used aircraft families, no?

It does not say it was a 737MAX, which would be quite improbable as they're still grounded.

Reacting just because it says 737 feels to me kinda like reaction becauase it says PC or Mac.

HGH being Human Growth Hormone? I've taken that during puberty, as a medium to get to "normal size"

In hindsight doctors say that might have been what triggered my chronic auto immune hepatitis (immune system attacks my own liver). They say basically they don't know and will probably never know, but it has been put forth as a possible trigger.

Be careful.

No expert either, but afaik you can divide livers into thirds and they will regrow. So when you transplant a liver you take two thirds from the donor, I assume to give the recipient more liver to work with, but I don't know why. (spelling edit)

Are you saying DOH does not affect client side ad blocking because it can be shut off?

This is where readin satanic texts early on in life really set the tone for me. Summed up they say "There's no point to anything so enjoy life as best you can, while you can". Those texts really focus on you as the supreme master of yourself as opposed to any external entity.

If the task you want to solve is automatic function naming I definitely think normalizing would be an improvement. But I'm not sure it would be the right thing for all applications. Don't have any examples though.

I never heard of stem cell treatment for auto-immune diseases at all. Got two conditions myself, I would not go for such a 'radical' treatment at this point though as I do not feel I suffer enough to try it out.

I will read up on it though.

But for know I'll just ask a question. What are the actual risks of stem cell treatment?

I'd say the technology for building a bot with computer vision is already here or close to it. So building a working one would not take long.

The problem, as they stated in the QnA is that the image processing would take much more hardware and computing power, this increasing both cost and training time, as you would not be able to run games as quickly anymore.

They specifically said they would have to implement a special case for heroes that control more than one unit in the future.

So you're saying that even before they set up a rule about microing illusions to protect humans from a feature that they have not yet implemented nor, I assume, have trained the model on?

I had to look up what 'end-to-end' means in regard to neural nets and machine learning. And the answer seems to differ slightly or very much with every webpage I hit.

Stack exchange says it means 'all classifiers are trained jointly', nvidia and quora seem more in line with what I assume it means in this project. 'No human input to training sets or results as part of learning' is that what this talks about?

Is it then, unsupervised learning?

Really cool project!

They're not forbidden to so business, they're forbidden to so business unless they adapt their product or practices. I'd say that is pretty much the same as this case?

Yes, he claims that was all the money he ever got from his 'accomplice' for selling a lot of things over several years, including screws and the CDs in question. The CDs according to him were only a minor part of that sum.

Doesn't mean it's necessarily true, for obvious reasons. And one can only hope the court looked through all that as thoroughly as possible.

Do you have a link to the court documents? This whole thing seems like a mess regardless of who is right. Although I'm quite sure these recovery discs do not allow you to install windows without a license.

They never did when I used such discs back in the days, and why would DELL be allowed to distribute software making such a thing possible? Of course you could argue that he has manipulated the program on the disc but as far as I know that has not been proven and he is claiming he did not.

He disputes the emails claiming they are made up and tampered with insinuating his partner in selling these CDs has implicated him to get a lesser sentence.

Obviously someone in this whole mess is lying or grossly misinformed, the problem is figuring out who.

He said he had IT-experts testify in court that the emails had been tampered with, I assume one could look into that in some kind of public record over the case?